top of page
CGT-General-strike-032323.jpg
General strike in France – workers in struggle everywhere!

NFLPA protests: New England's Gillette Stadium trades World Cup grass for turf

Editorial

This is a terrible turn of events for NFL players and their union, the National Football League Players Association. This change back from natural grass to artificial turf surface at Gillette stadium will result in more injuries in a sport that is already too dangerous. Diseases like CTE are more likely to occur from long careers played on an artificial turf surface. Star players like Mike Webster, Center for the Pittsburgh Steelers and Junior Seau of the San Diego Chargers lives were ended by CTE. The NFLPA is right to raise hell about it. LTI supports the NFLPA on this important safety and health issue. Keep the grass surfaces in the NFL playing venues absolutely! MAKE THIS A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN.

--LTI Editors


By  Olamilekan Ajayi  (Sporting News) July 13, 2026

 

The natural grass surface installed at Gillette Stadium in Foxborough for the 2026 FIFA World Cup has been removed, per Caleb Pongratz, via Dov Kleiman on X, with the stadium returning to artificial turf ahead of the 2026 NFL season. The field hosted seven World Cup matches before the removal.

The NFLPA issued a pointed statement the moment the contrast became undeniable.

 

"The temporary installation of natural grass fields for the World Cup is a choice by certain NFL team owners to do for soccer players what they refuse to do for NFL players," the union said. "It's no longer a question of capability: the technology exists, the expertise exists and the resources exist to install the high-level grass fields that our players overwhelmingly prefer. We have seen the meaningful investments made to meet the standard for international athletes and global events. NFL players — who regularly compete on these fields, help fund these stadiums, and whose work makes the league what it is today — deserve the same commitment to quality grass fields."

The stadium hosted seven World Cup matches before the removal

Gillette was one of at least five NFL venues that installed temporary natural grass for the tournament, as FIFA mandates natural surfaces at all its events. The stadium had used artificial turf since November 2006, but its original 2002 construction included an irrigation system and underground heating infrastructure that made the conversion manageable.  

Field superintendent Ryan Bjorn said the installation process took six weeks, starting the day after the Patriots' Super Bowl send-off rally on February 1.

Patriots players welcomed the temporary change.

"Playing on grass is a lot less taxing on the knees and ankles and joints like that," running back Rhamondre Stevenson said, mentioning that feeling sore is pretty common after games on turf.

"Just speaking personally for myself, I love playing on grass," safety Brenden Schooler said. "I think it’s got more give on it, doesn’t hurt as bad when you fall. When it’s freezing out, it doesn’t cut you up as bad as turf does. You don’t have to worry about turf burn. And I think from doing my own research and looking at data and stuff, I think turf — you have the unfortunate thing that you kind of get caught up, and guys get rolled up on, and your knee gets, or ankle gets stuck. And like I was saying, grass has got a little bit more give."

The NFLPA separately polled 1,700 players and found 92 percent prefer natural grass over turf. 49ers tight end George Kittle said this month on the Pardon My Take podcast: "If you can put grass in MetLife and in SoFi, I think you could do that year-round if you really gave a shit."

The NFL has pointed to its own injury data showing comparable rates between surfaces: 0.43 injuries per 100 plays on artificial turf and 0.42 on grass.

The NFLPA disputes the framing, citing a 28 percent higher rate of non-contact lower extremity injuries on turf and a 69 percent higher rate of non-contact foot and ankle injuries compared to natural surfaces.

The grass is now gone from Gillette. The argument over why it could not stay is not.


 
 
 

Comments


Workers and Retirees vs. Milei: The Fight for a Shared Future

Class War and Market Predation

Contra la privatización: La clase obrera argentina en lucha

We must be clear: the assault on Argentine retirees is a direct attack on the entire working class. While the capitalist media distracts us with the president’s erratic social media outbursts, we recognize these as a smokescreen for the systemic dismantling of our social security. We refuse to be passive observers as the wealth we generated through decades of labor is handed over to private financiers and local oligarchs under the guise of austerity.

This is not a crisis of leadership—it is a brutal class war.

Our demand is non-negotiable: we must establish a new public, non-state, pay-as-you-go, and solidarity-based pension system. This structure must be managed and administered directly by those it serves: active and retired workers. We refuse any attempt at privatization or the further erosion of our dignity by a government that views the elderly as liabilities rather than the builders of our nation’s heritage. The struggle of the retirees is the struggle of every union member today.

International Solidarity Against Capital

The core issue is not the president’s personality, but the predatory capitalist agenda he enforces. As rival factions of the right-wing elite squabble over the spoils of the state, the working class continues to suffer. Whether it is the internal corruption of 'Freedom Advances' or the boardroom battles between industrial giants like Paolo Rocca and the Clarín Group, the outcome for us is always the same: austerity, layoffs, and the theft of our futures. We stand with those defending public education, healthcare, and science against a 'lion' who is nothing more than a puppet for global capital. No worker is left behind in this fight.

Argentina, May 18, 2026
NATIONAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE OF RETIREES' AND PENSIONERS' ORGANIZATIONS OF THE ARGENTINE REPUBLIC

bottom of page